McCain's Shocker "That One!" Comment At The 2nd Presidential Debate
66
His Name Is Senator Obama!
Racism is alive and well in the McCain campaign. They can no longer deny it, how many examples from them do we need before we say "Enough!" The Republican candidates, Palin and McCain, over this past few weeks have left me and thousands of Americans, ill. I'm closed, shut down, sickened.
He has a name, McCain, and it's not "that one!" As soon as those hateful words from McCain's tongue, unbridled slipped, horrible visions entered my mind and the minds across the land. We all felt it, no one wants to even talk about it much, but the meaning was clear. McCain's racist behavior is so ingrained in him, so buried in habit, thought, and speech, he's not even aware of it when it "rears it's head," to use a now famous phrase from Palin's wide range of speech. We'll get to her in a minute, even though McCain wisely didn't mention her during the debate, choosing instead to mention Lieberman more than once.
As the words "that one!" hung in mid-air, McCain's last thread of decency hung with them, and then melted away in a matter of seconds. It's gone. I have no more, not even a hint of, respect for the man. And, I use the term "man" loosely.
Immediately, call me too sensitive if you will, I had the image of hundreds of young black youths, standing on the docks of yesterday, being examined by the eyes of power. Land-owners, who would take them back to their plantations for a life of work and hardship in most cases.
I can hear the plantation managers, the land giants and owners sneers, their disrespect, their de-valuing of another human being because of the color of their skin, their strong remarks landing like hard rocks on the hearts of those scrutinized for choosing..."I'll take 'that one', and 'that one,' and 'that one over there' they would say, the power dripping from their voice. I can see the eyes of the young black men, forever changed by those two powerful words...."that one."
"THAT ONE!" McCain? You had no hesitation, no feeling that those words would carry a burden of history, as they flowed easily from your slick tongue? No wisdom whispered to you, no warning of the indecency of your comment?
No, nothing warned you, even your soul has stopped talking to you long ago. It is evident in your sneering facial expressions, your constant re-invention and re-statement of who you are and what you do or did. It changes momentarily, your self image is being constantly painted before even your own eyes, reflected back as whomever you want to be, in that second. You have no anchor, no set values, no wholeness of truth to live by, no boundaries. You are a hollow core.
In your eyes, you are never wrong. Only "that one" over there, is wrong. That one. By those 2 words, Senator McCain, you regurgitated history, a shameful history that does not deserve repetition.
Senator John McCain, you are despicable. Your partner in the crime of "despicable-ness," Sarah Palin, is now under scrutiny by not only average Americans on the ground, but government officials who might have to instruct her to take comments from her speeches, as they serve to incite hate and anger to such high levels that someone listening, maybe several someones, would shout out "Kill him!" "Treason!" and "Terrorist" as you talk about a Senator of the United States of America. As you mislead and misguide the willing, you have joined the ranks of "despica-bility."
You, Sarah Palin, (no mild-mannered governor, who's "first dude" has "pal'd" around with those who would actively seek to have Alaska secede from the union, which is no less an Act of Domestic Terrorism of it's own) asked a crowd the pre-planned, emotionally charged question "What do you do with a person who associates with terrorists?" You asked that question over and over, which could only have an intent of escalating and inciting others to hate, and might well be restricted by the Secret Service, in order to protect our Senators and officials from that kind of reckless, dangerous call.
Soon, "Kill him" someone cries out. And, what does the God-fearing Sarah Palin do? Continues on, with a snide smile that says "Now, you're talkin'!" as she spews more and more hate and fear of another American, about whom she KNOWS she is misleading the facts.
I'm ashamed of you, Sarah Palin, you give the word "Christian" a bad name; you give the Republican Candidate for Vice President of the United States of America, a bad name; you give patriotism, a bad name; you give "radical" a worse name.
Your actions have given me courage to denounce you, your hate, your bias, your lies, your deceit, your past associations with witch hunters and state seceders, your uncooperative spirit with a legitimate investigation of your use of power as governor.
This is a most embarassing time in American political history, that we would give honor and recognition to a person such as yourself.
There is a distance, down the road of elections, up the road to the White House, that no decent person can travel, Sarah. We know that you are young, new, but you are not acting in "newbie-ism." You are traveling the low road, upon which honorable American politicians fear and tremble, and do not walk.
You and John McCain are, after all, the perfect pair.
From just listening, I shall have to wash thoroughly, to become clean from the dirt you smear.
I am Marisue, an average American, on the ground, and I am sickened by the behavior, of Palin and McCain.
Update: 10-10-08 -- there are those "few" who would dare to say, that racism is not an issue, that character and inciting hate and anger on the Republican side, is not an issue; those few people in protest of this hub would cry "let's talk about the issues." I say "let's." This hub did talk about the issues; if character is an issue for Obama, then do not censor me. I can and will bring up character as an issue for McCain. He has many pieces for us to discuss, this is only a portion.
I will not be censored by those who are one-sided. They can discuss their views, I will discuss mine. Since my views are mirrored all over the news from both sides of the parties, I obviously have quality company.
All views are welcome here, but do not expect me to be a doormat with no voice as those opposing attempt to wipe their feet on this article. Speak your piece, and expect me to speak mine. many have died to give us all that right!
I accept that we may view things differently. Let's just stay respectful about it, which is my exact complaint against Palin-McCain. We all have the dramatic license of a bit of mockery.
I would like to add that none of what I've said here or below in comments, was intended to "hurt" anyone, at the same time, I'd like for people to also know that it's not right to attempt to "hurt" me, though I choose not to let it happen, I'm just asking for us all to be decent. I will take up for myself, as I expect others to do as well. That said, "let 'er rip!" =)
CommentsLoading...
Sure I do :)
Cause I honestly think it won't make any difference :)
Misha, I think you may be on to something, there.
Mari, I saw and heard the "That one" comment too and was disgusted at the time, and was so glad one of the commentators called him (McCain) "Childish" afterwards. McCain and Palin have not only consistently made poor showings in the debates but have consistently been outdebated, in all forms which matter, by Obama and Biden.
Watch McCain win... 'cause that's how it works here.
Can't force you of course. And don't want to :)
McCain also patronized a black questioner in the audience with words to the effect that "you probably haven't heard of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac." etc. Also McCain neglected to shake hands with Obama after the debate, ignoring or not noticing Obama's outstretched hand. McCain is losing it. (his composure to put it politely.)
It all STINKS..why is there only 2? G-Ma :o) hugs...p.s. good hub dear
You are so completely correct. He came off as a Hollow feeble babbling 'man'? I love this article --take it to the newspapers, esp those in Ohio, Pa, Florida and else where.
McCain's antics ceased to be amusing a long time ago. He apparently wakes up in a new world every day, and as a coincidence, he is always a perfect hero in every one of them. "I can fix this", he says about every problem, "and I know how." This is not the behavior of a sane person. At one point McCain said something about "as I've exhibited throughout my military career."
I wanted to yell at the TV set "your military career exhibits erratic, aggressive, cavalier disregard for safety, regulations and honor." This man wrecked several jets. Only the singular fact that he spent 5 years in a North Vietnamese prison, and the fact that his father was a 4 star admiral, saved him from being pushed out of the service due to his hot-dogging and erratic antics as a pilot. He's still the same guy he was in high school, "John McNasty."
On any ship in the Navy, there are good men and bad men, and men somewhere in the middle; no matter what your measure of good or bad might be. When the ship comes under fire, they could all be called "heros." The same is true for anyone risking his life by flying missions in wartime as John McCain did, and certainly so when they get captured and serve time in an enemy prison as he did.
But when these guys come home, damaged emotionally as many of them are, the question becomes: "What do you do with a LIVE hero?"
Some of them adapt to the post-war world they come home to. Many do not. Life with some of them can be not only "interesting," it can be dangerous.
John McCain was damaged by his childhood, and further damaged by his experience in enemy prisons. He is now permanently on the verge of an explosive, barely controlled outburst. Can you imagine this person in charge of our nuclear arsenal? I shudder to think of it.
Why does this strange little man have any support at all?
It's because he supports the 1/7th of the population that believes human life begins at conception, and that all abortions from that point on should be criminalized. These people will support anyone who is in their camp on this issue. Plus, there are a few, but only a few, of the Republicans who will support any republican no matter how strange they may act. Add those up and you could get 30-40% of the voters. That's about what McCain has supporting him so far.
Let's hope this erratic, explosive, and angry little man is not given a chance to control our government.
Let's explore the Hero thing. The thing that makes McCain, untouchable. If you ever watch the history Channel they have replays of aerial dog fights and they, explain the rigours, $5,000,000 worth of training that American pilots go through before they get their own $18,000,000, air crafts to roar through the skies with.
According to the training and the type of aircraft McCain flew he had the power, expert training, and maneuverability of a superior aircraft to keep him in the game and the winners circle.
Here's the thing, after watching McCain you can bet McCain tried some unauthordox, maneuver that jumped into his mind and that' why he spent 5 years as a POW.
Last time up to bat McCain lost the taxpayers $23,000,000, and for that he's called a Hero, also by not letting them send him home out of turn He gets called a Hero.
I know what they would have called him had he accepted the early out. Especially the guy who's turn it really was. So there he just did what he was suppose to do.
It's not uncommon to find paper work heros in the files of our military. This guys been riding on Pixie dust a long time.
This whole thing makes me sick. This entire hub and all the comments. I don't know what else to say. I watched the entire debate, and I think you saw and heard what you wanted to, extracted what you wanted out of it, and that's it.
Anna, I did the same. I watched and saw that Obama dodged a huge question about Isreal which is a very important question. He talked around it. Guess that's less important the McCain saying those 2 horrible words huh? I actually didn't notice what either one of them called the other. I watched to see the IMPORTANT topics discussed. Guess some of us watched for different reasons. Some people have waaaayyy too much time on their hands. This hub is proof. Oh well. Where's the hub about real issues?
I liked the last move at debate's end where the candidates blocked Tom Brokaw's giant teleprompting screen as a joke. I saw all three laughing on the channel I watched -- This is really like the WWE and WWF more all the time, but entertaining.
Playing back the tape, I heard again "This one" which is worse, I think - a frequently-used term I've heard backwater families use to denigrate a family member right in front of the person.
I watched the debates for the issues. Several times I saw Obama dodge questions and just spout garbage. He was asked a simple question as to who he would nominate to a cabinet position, and rather than just answer the question by mentioning a few names, he just spouted the same things over and over. I did watch very closely. Sorry if I came off harsh before. I have the utmost respect for you, marisue. I just think that too many people are reading too deeply into little things, and this goes for both sides, and are ignoring the real points that matter.
I didn't think anything was acomplished by last night's debate. I want to see it on Sat. Night Live.
Marisue, Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!
As a black woman I don't even have the words to express the myriad of emotions that I have been experiencing over these past three weeks.
I'm forty-nine years old and I remember when I was eight just four months before my ninth birthday, Martin Luther King was murdered spreading a message of peace, love and equality for all men.
I remember my mother and grandmother holding each other and weeping and wailing like someone in our family had died. I had never heard of Dr. King until the day he died. It was after his death I became acquainted with him after he was gone.
What I saw and experienced after that was eye opening. All of a sudden my world became black and white. This new world I didn't like much because there was never a difference to me; we were all the same we only looked different, which made the world wonderful and colorful, but it appeared everyone did not look at the world like I did.
This world became a world of hatred and bigotry...as a little girl I was afraid. I saw my world shattered with cities burning, marchers being attacked by dogs, people being hung in trees and people being put in jail just because the color of their skin.
I have to say that, that little girl has come back in the last few weeks. Again, I'm seeing hatred, I'm hearing about people being shot because they have on an Obama shirt on...
Please, Please American, we can't go backwards, we must move forward.
And, to my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ, we must begin to intercede for our nation. We must do like Daniel and begin to repent for the sins of our nation. We need God right NOW!
Tim McVeigh, the man who bombed the Murrow Federal Building in Oklahoma City, was a decorated combat veteran, winning both the Bronze Star and the Combat Infantryman badge.
Obviously at the time they were awarded, he deserved them. Both are high honors, given to men and women who act over and above what is expected.
However, would anyone today consider Tim McVeigh a hero? Would anyone honor his service?
I have known many heroes in my life, some of them in the military when I served for 5 years. However, I have also known some people in the military who deserved to be in jail for the things they did and said back then.
First and foremost were the White Supremicists who kicked and beat the crap out of me in Torrejon, Spain, when I had the audacity to be dating a young Black Jamaican woman. Later, I married Spanish woman.
They called me a "race traitor" and threatened the people I knew. And yes, they were fellow service people. Not all were men, either.
I am White, or Caucasian as I prefer, because I think the terrn "race" was invented in order to keep some people down and put others in charge.
Just the same, soldiers such as Tim McVeigh dishonor the country and uniform they wore by their actions. If McCain is being racist, then he dishonors the uniform he wore as well as the legacy by which he desired to be remembered. To me he is no better than those people who called me a "race traitor."
Real heroes honor honor, while false heroes tarnish honor. Take your choice concerning McCain.
Well said, Level1. I could not agree more, but one scary question; was it not that 30% to 40% who elected Gee Duh? Twice?
Sorry, but your hub comes across as looking for something wrong with McCain. I watched to find out what they said about things that are important to the American pubilc. Not what they called each other. I want to know about taxes, Isreal, protecting the nation, unemployment, this mess of a bailout, health care, things like that that impact people. What they call each other didn't make it to my list of important issues. I'd also like to know all of their feelings on the death penalty. But, I still don't know that. You spent a lifetime making an opinion on McCain saying 2 words wrong, in your opinion? (And I'm sure if an Obama supporter reads this, they'll feel the same.) It just seems petty to me when there are so much more to talk about with real issues, like I listed.
And several of the things you said to/about my posts on another hub was disrepectful to me. Whether you meant it or not, it was to me. Maybe like you take those 2 words McCain said. You may not have meant them to be disrespectful, but they seemed it to me. McCain may have meant nothing by what he said, but how are you taking them?
I can tell you were moved - I had missed this one. Much history still left - there are many a youth with clear ancestors rooted in slavery - on both sides. We're not out of it yet, but so many of us wanting to heal the hurt will eventually make it happen.
Constant, (on your first comment) you said it and I certainly agree to an extent, but I really don't *want* it to be true. Actually, I have a slight wonder if either one will actually make it through the presidency as many of those who actually stand for real change get killed.
History in the making...
Rainbow - There have indeed been many rumors of assassination attempts to come agasint candidates and/or families. Interestingly, Mr. Browkaw said at olne point, "If either one of you becomes president (kind of long pause),..which you will..
Shook, I listened for exactly the same things, and heard them: Strong, common sense, do-able plans for real solutions, from Obama. His focus is on "How Can We Fix The Mess This Country Is In?"
From McCain I heard tired rhetoric and "I know how to fix that" but no real plan for HOW. He spent his time telling people how wonderful he is and how terrible Obama is. His focus is on getting elected... at any expense, no matter what. His choice of Palin proved that.
Obama didn't need to spend any effort trying to make McCain look bad. McCain did that all on his own.
And no, I'm not a Democrat or a Liberal. I'm an Independent. My interest is finding and electing THE BEST AND SMARTEST CANDIDATE. Period.
Rainbow, in that case McCain would be perfectly safe. His policies are literally "more of the same." Trust me. He's safe.
Well said, M. Personally (and I don't think I'm the only one who thought this) I thought the remark was more "childish" than "petty" ...or even racist. It just made him look childish, OK, petty, and down right silly.
Neither candidte really articulated a new position on the key issues so don't bother looking for contrast there. That leaves us, the viewers to wonder what else was there to pick up on. Well, how about body language? How about an out of turn comment like, "That one"? Those two simple words speak volumes of the man and his deep seated attitude towards another, and we can't help but pick up on them in light of recent history. Remember two other simple words, "You people," uttered by in 1992 by another "maverick" in his own way? They buried his political career. In today's diverse society, one cannot assume he or she can do and say as he or she wishes without scrutiny.
I continue to be amazed at Serah Palin. Now I understand why they called her Baraccuda. Stating a lie is excusable; but repeating it over and over and with such venom is not Christian and, I say so as a Christian myself. If, as they say, politics is a dirty game, then she's indeed a quick study.
Great hub Marisue. You obviously touched a sore spot for all of us I daresay. I don't think things will improve unless we confront our true feelings in light of today's realities. The world is changing and we need to adapt to the changes. The more I watch the Palin/McCain ticket the more I think four more years of Bush might actually be better than what this incongruous duo portends.
Level1diet you got it entirely right!
Thanks marisue for another great hub. I put it on stumble upon. People should read this.
We need to call it what it is, racism. McCain-Palin are seeking to divide the country even further with their hate speech. They personally have yet to come out and say to their supporters that their speech is not appropriate in a civilized society. They left that to a staffer to put out a lame comment.
This kind of hate speech can lead to very disatrous consquences. McCain left quickly because he knew he did not play well in the hall.
His contempt for the American public is so clear to see. This is not the man that should have the nuclear codes. At the debate, he couldn't even bring up Bill Ayers, he is leaving that up to his number 2. Sarah gives pitbulls a bad name.
I knew you would not acknowledge that you were like that to me. I had no doubt. No shock there. But you're doing the same thing to me you claim McCain did to offend you, yet you write a hub about it. Seems rather immautre. But, hey, that's your choice.
I have seen some hubs like "Jews hate obama" where any opinion not on the lines of the moderator is censored and this hub where any positive opinion about McCain is thrashed around.
I have no stake in these elections as I am not allowed to vote but have found some observations which are as follows:
1) Majority of the people already have made up their minds whom they want to vote.
2) People who disagree with their opinions are considered as not having the "correct" facts or perspective.
3) Very few people are having "balanced" opinion just based on the facts.
My take on the candidates is :
Sarah Palin
1) Charming lady with a charisma. She does tend to avoid answering directly (Now my brief experience as Interviewing candidates for job interviews) is that people who are not sure of their subject or fear they maybe deliberately side tracked... go for the middle of the road approach or give vague responses. These people tend to rely on their human touch and likability factor(small talk/smiling unnecesarily) to get selected.
Joe Biden:
2) He seems to talk a lot and reels of facts/statistics a lot. These people tend to act as a know all and can easily bore others with how much they know (They need to be brief and answer direct to the point). Such people also tend to take strong stands on issues(maybe even over confident at times) and if they are correct stands then certainly everybody is benefitted.
John McCain
3) Certainly a person who means "been there and done that" kinda attitude. These people tend to keep their cards close to their heart but still project an attitude of supreme confidence. These people are cool heads and can certainly steer the boat in troubled water. But these people can also be arrogant who may look down upon anybody not possessing similar credentials.
Barak Obama
4) He is a knowledgeble person without having a whole lot of experience. He kinda talks like a professor taking a class and explaining things to students. He is kinda good at understanding the overall scenario theoretically but lacks the experience which is needed in real times of crisis as and when faced with. Such people will need to be able to form good teams to help him in taking key decisions.
All these IMHO are personal opinions. There are certainly bound to be gaps in my understanding and I apologize for the same.
How refreshing to hear an "outsiders" perspective. I agree about Obama. Intelligent but lacking experience. No worry. Every president has a White House FULL of very experienced staff members.
Marisue, wasn't McCain's comment about Fannie May "You probably hadn't about them before recent events."? Because that would be very probable. Not everyone follows NYSE. I'm not defending McCain, just trying to get the facts straight.
Marisue-I feel anybody for anything important in life should be open to taking n number of opinions from others but the ultimate onus of decision always lies with us.
ConstantWalker- I am so "SAD" my friend you made me an "outsider"... LOL
Great job, Marisue! I really enjoyed most of the comments also. Pity some people have resorted to such childish tactics in an effort to belittle you, but I think you've handled that rather gracefully, which is more than I can say for them.
For what it's worth, I don't think McCain and his sidekick have a snowball's chance in hell of winning the election (even in our notably flawed electorial system), but nevertheless, they seem intent on fanning the flames of divisive hatred as much as possible between now and the election. Their tactics are old, clumsy, and disgusting, and I'm glad you've called them out on it.
No worries. :) I've done my fair share of ranting about the election, and I agree that neither candidate is perfect, but McCain and Palin send shivers up my spine, and it's sad to see people defending them with such venomous disdain for those who don't share their views.
At least we're nearing the finish line, although it seems like it can't get here quickly enough.
I heard him say it and I was like wtf?
Once again I think McCain is too old and not in a position to be President of the United States. He may be practicing his speeches more often now, but he should have been more careful than to make such a comment towards Obama. It may have been a mistake on his part as he may be nervous when making speeches, but overall he is just not the knowledgeable candidate with the ambition to make better changes for America. McCain's attitude is we should continue fighting and he will use his military record again and again to connect with veterans. That is nice he has commraderie with the vets, but this does not mean he should be elected to the highest office in the nation. Great hub as always Marisue. Obama used to teach at a law school, thus his presence with an audience and his great speech making ability. I just wanted to answer countrywoman's observations about how he speaks as a professor because he has taught graduate courses on law.
Marisue,
I was enquiring about an earlier comment and searched on the web to realize what it meant. Hence asked you to delete my comment.
I always believe and you can disagree with me on this: that we don't have to act the way the others treat us. Then there is no difference between those who attack and those who don't.
If someone calls me "immature" do I become one or if someone calls me a "genius" do I become einstein? I am what I am and that's it. Other's opinion of us constantly changes and there is no end to it. I agree everyone has a right to disagree agreebly. That's the beauty of United States. Imagine being in tightly controlled dictatorships or communist countries it's not possible.
Ultimately us saying something doesn't change anybody's opinion(just us they saying something also doesn't change ours) but our accommodation of the other person's views may helps us to make in roads into the other person re evaluating their own views. If not let us live that.
(In Mahatma Gandhi's Book "My Experiments with truth": He makes a very good statement which goes like this "If others hurt us then at the back of their mind they expect us to hit back. But when we don't then they will introspect and realize their actions")
All the above is again IMHO and I am sorry if I anything I said is not appropriate in this hub.
Marisuwrites, your policy of not deleting comments from your hubs is commendable. I don't even read hubs of several people who keep deleting my comments-e.g., Malachi and allshook up. I welcome all comers on my hubs. I don't believe I've ever deleted a comment, certainly not one because it disagreed with me.
Country, I knew that was the wrong word. "Non-citizen"?
Personally, I think an "outsider" perspective is better. One can always see something better when on the outside looking in. You know?
Ralph, I'm having a problem with a hubber named Dineshmalshe (I think). Twice now, he's left what was easily a 700-800 word comment, or longer!, on one of my hubs which were preachy and had nothing to do with the hub subject. The first time I deleted the comment and told him exactly why. The second time, yesterday, I also deleted it and again told him why, but this time not so nicely.
I should have clicked on his picture and sent him a direct message telling him to knock it off or he would be reported, but I didn't think of that until after I'd deleted his book, I mean comment.
Anybody know who this person is. A search for his name brought up nadda, but he had a picture, so he's got to be a hubber, right?
One thing that makes me mad is Sarah Palin wanted to imply Barack Obama is unAmerican. She is still up to that business, and McCain is so wishy washy he lets her get away with it. He made a mistake in chosing her as VP running mate.
Country. I, personally, thought your last comment was intelligent and wise. I definitely need to read some of your stuff!
LOL Ralph, I am definitely with you on Malachi guy. What a tool! :)
Keep up the great journalism Marisue. Hopefully some of your writings will get through to search engine traffic that is still deciding on who to vote for.
In my experience, marisue has always been welcoming of diffferent opinions. That kind of discussion is what makes America great.
I will speak for me but I didn't watch the debate to watch John McCain screw up. I watched the debate to see what both candidates think on the issues. Though my mind is made up already (having watched every bit of this since the very beginning), I have a good idea on where both stand.
Alicia, I understand your feelings. I remember when Dr.King was asssassinated and then Bobby. Men of peace gone too soon. I am frightened for Barack Obama with the tone that the campaign speeches have taken, mostly by Sarah Palin. But I am going to keep the faith.
CountrywomanYour assessment of the candidates is very superficial and you speak in generalities. In my opinion, what is going on is beyond Sarah Palin being charming. There is nothing charming about having someone yell "kill him" as she ignites the crowd with her negative rhetoric. Even some of the most conservative columnists and Republicans feel that she is not fit to serve and her negatives are rising.
The conservative journalist Kathleen Parker wrote in the Washington Post, "Democrats and other critics distracted by her winks may have missed the message, but Palin's target audience heard it loud and clear. She is like the high-pitched whistle only dogs can hear. While Democrats heard non-answers, superfluous segues and cartoon words -- shout-out, I'll betcha, doggone, extra credit -- Republicans heard God, patriotism, courage, victory."
What kind of charisma is it to spew such hatred as to incite the crowds to say things like "Kill him" and not to say anything to the crowd. At a recent rally, an African American cameraman was told to "sit down boy" while he was trying to do his job. Is this charming?
It is important to speak out when things are getting out of control. I am reminded of the poem by Pastor Martin Niemöller (date approx. 1955. It has gone through several changes since then but here is the orginal that is inscribed at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. reads:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me
The version inscribed at the New England Holocaust Memorial in Boston, Massachusetts reads: They came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up. I am afraid that McCain is grasping at straws and now feels that the only way to win is to ride the waves of character assassination. In fact, recently a McCain staffer told the NY Daily News that they can't win on the issues especially the economy and so they will try to deflect the discussion to one of innuendo.
I for one long for the day when we can get back to decency in politics and debate the issues.
In my experience, marisue has always been welcoming of diffferent opinions. That kind of discussion is what makes America great.
I will speak for me but I didn't watch the debate to watch John McCain screw up. I watched the debate to see what both candidates think on the issues. Though my mind is made up already (having watched every bit of this since the very beginning), I have a good idea on where both stand.
Alicia, I understand your feelings. I remember when Dr.King was asssassinated and then Bobby. Men of peace gone too soon. I am frightened for Barack Obama with the tone that the campaign speeches have taken, mostly by Sarah Palin. But I am going to keep the faith.
CountrywomanYour assessment of the candidates is very superficial and you speak in generalities. In my opinion, what is going on is beyond Sarah Palin being charming. There is nothing charming about having someone yell "kill him" as she ignites the crowd with her negative rhetoric. Even some of the most conservative columnists and Republicans feel that she is not fit to serve and her negatives are rising.
The conservative journalist Kathleen Parker wrote in the Washington Post, "Democrats and other critics distracted by her winks may have missed the message, but Palin's target audience heard it loud and clear. She is like the high-pitched whistle only dogs can hear. While Democrats heard non-answers, superfluous segues and cartoon words -- shout-out, I'll betcha, doggone, extra credit -- Republicans heard God, patriotism, courage, victory."
What kind of charisma is it to spew such hatred as to incite the crowds to say things like "Kill him" and not to say anything to the crowd. At a recent rally, an African American cameraman was told to "sit down boy" while he was trying to do his job. Is this charming?
It is important to speak out when things are getting out of control. I am reminded of the poem by Pastor Martin Niemöller (date approx. 1955. It has gone through several changes since then but here is the orginal that is inscribed at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. reads:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out -
because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out -
because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out -
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me -
and there was no one left to speak for me
The version inscribed at the New England Holocaust Memorial in Boston, Massachusetts reads:They came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and by that time no one was left to speak up.
I am afraid that McCain is grasping at straws and now feels that the only way to win is to ride the waves of character assassination. In fact, recently a McCain staffer told the NY Daily News that they can't win on the issues especially the economy and so they will try to deflect the discussion to one of innuendo.
I for one long for the day when we can get back to decency in politics and debate the issues.
LOL Marisue, now you have to choose which of Susan's comments to decline :D
Thank God for Tina Fey boy. believe it or not, she is having an impact on this race.
------- Forwarded message follows -------A British Perspective:Flirting her way to victorySarah Palin's farcical debate performance lowered the standards for bothfemale candidates andUSpolitical discourseMichelle Goldberg FridayOctober 3 2008guardian.co.ukAt least three times last night, Sarah Palin, the adorable, preposterousvice-presidential candidate, winked at the audience. Had a male candidatewith a similar reputation for attractive vapidity made such a brazen attemptto flirt his way into the good graces of the voting public, it would haveuniversally noted, discussed and mocked. Palin, however, has single- handedlyso lowered the standards both for female candidates and American politicaldiscourse that, with her newfound ability to speak in more-or-less fullsentences, she is now deemed to have performed acceptably last night.By any normal standard, including the ones applied to male presidentialcandidates of either party, she did not. Early on, she made the astonishingannouncement that she had no intentions of actually answering the queriesput to her. "I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or youwant to hear, but I'm going to talk straight to the American people and letthem know my track record also," she said.And so she preceded, with an almost surreal disregard for the subjects shewas supposed to be discussing, to unleash fusillades of scripted attacklines, platitudes, lies, gibberish and grating references to her ownpseudo-folksy authenticity.It was an appalling display. The only reason it was not widely described assuch is that too many American pundits don't even try to judge the truth,wisdom or reasonableness of the political rhetoric they are paid topronounce upon. Instead, they imagine themselves as interpreters of amythical mass of "average Americans" who they both venerate and despise.In pronouncing upon a debate, they don't try and determine whether acandidate's responses correspond to existing reality, or whether he or sheis capable of talking about subjects such as the deregulation of thefinancial markets or the devolution of the war inAfghanistan. The criteriaare far more vaporous. In this case, it was whether Palin could avoidutterly humiliating herself for 90 minutes, and whether urbane commentatorswould believe that she had connected to a public that they see as ignorantand sentimental. For theAlaskagovernor, mission accomplished.There is indeed something mesmerising about Palin, with her manic beamingand fulsome confidence in her own charm. The force of her personalitymanaged to slightly obscure the insulting emptiness of her answers lastnight. It's worth reading the transcript of the encounter, where it becomesclearer how bizarre much of what she said was. Here, for example, is how sheresponded to Biden's comments about how the middle class has beenshort-changed during the Bush administration, and how McCain will continueBush's policies:Say it ain't so, Joe, there you go again pointing backwards again. Youpreferenced [sic] your whole comment with the Bush administration. Nowdoggone it, let's look ahead and tell Americans what we have to plan to dofor them in the future. You mentioned education, and I'm glad you did. Iknow education you are passionate about with your wife being a teacher for30 years, and god bless her. Her reward is in heaven, right? ... My brother,who I think is the best schoolteacher in the year, and here's a shout-out toall those third graders atGladysWoodElementary School, you get extracredit for watching the debate.Evidently, Palin's pre-debate handlers judged her incapable of speaking on afairly wide range of subjects, and so instructed to her to simply disregardquestions that did not invite memorised talking points or cutesyfilibustering. They probably told her to play up her spunky average-ness,which she did to the point of shtick - and dishonesty. Asked what herachilles heel is - a question she either didn't understand or chose toignore - she started in on how McCain chose her because of her "connectionto the heartland ofAmerica. Being a mom, one very concerned about a son inthe war, about a special needs child, about kids heading off to college, howare we going to pay those tuition bills?"None of Palin's children, it should be noted, are heading off to college.Her son is on the way toIraq, and her pregnant 17-year-old daughter isengaged to be married to a high-school dropout and self-described "fuckin'redneck". Palin is a woman who can't even tell the truth about the mostquotidian and public details of her own life, never mind about matters ofmajor public import. In her only vice-presidential debate, she was shallow,mendacious and phoney. What kind of maverick, after all, keeps harping onwhat a maverick she is? That her performance was considered anything but afarce doesn't show how high Palin has risen, but how low we all have sunk.Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008------- End of forwarded message -------
You are welcome marisue....I am glad to have gotten to meet you.
Hey DJ, you are right. Thank God for Tina Fey. There is a rumor and I have no idea if it is true, that Sarah Palin may make a guest appearance on SNL and play Tina Fey. Did anyone else hear that? Now that would be funny.
But you know comedy has always been important in politics. The ability to take a situation and do political satire gives us the ability to look at emotionally charged issues in a different way.
I read somewhere that he called his wife a "cunt" in front of several other people.
marisue, you are right. Words Matter! We need to be sensitive to what is offensive to other cultures and races.
This election season has been amazing in some respects and sad in others.it is 2008 and we have the first African American candidate, who beat out the first woman in a primary.
This is something I never thought I would see in my lifetime. And yet is 2008 and we are talking about race in such a horrible way.
John McCain knew what he was saying. What saddens me is that this John McCain will say anything to get elected. This is not the McCain of 2000 who was himself the recipient of ugly whisper campaign in the South Carolina primary.
The rumor went around that he had fathered a black baby out of wedlock (by the way those campaigns were the same people that McCain has hired to do his dirty work in this campaign). They were referring to their daughter who they adopted from a Bengladesh orphanage.
The McCains went on to say, "I believe that there is a special place in hell for people like those."
This isn't the first time John McCain has gotten into trouble for making racist remarks. Back in 2000, Sen. John McCain told reporters, "I hated the gooks. I will hate them as long as I live." And while he said he was referring to his prison guards, he offended the Asian community by his initial refusal to apologize.
It took him 3 days to issue an apology after the backlash from his comment. He said, "I was referring to my prison guards," McCain said, "and I will continue to refer to them in language that might offend some people because of the beating and torture of my friends."
(http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/02/18/MN32194.DTL)
(http://asianweek.com/2000_02_24/feature_mccainapol
You should watch this You Tube clip where John McCain uses the phrase Tar Baby in a very unusual way and draw your own conclusion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNGXB_qx0xk
Lastly, this is the You Tube video of McCain answering a question during the primary season calling the HS student who asked him a question about his age, "you little jerk."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2zx3-0zOPs
when you start to get such a string of comments, you begin to wonder about his temperment to be President.
Marisue- I agree you felt and did take a stand on a issue which is very close to your heart. I only felt maybe sometimes we may end up winning an argument but lose a friend(In this case other person(s) may stop visiting or we will be bereft of understanding alternate perspectives).
Susan-Iam glad you took some time to go through my perspective. I highly value your evaluation and as I mentioned it was totally my personal opinion. Although beauty isn't just skin deep but still physical looks/ mannerisms tend to affect us. Atleast at first glance she appears charming until one really drills her to get to the substance within her.
ConstantWalker-Thanks for such a "flattering" observation about me. But seriously I am very normal so is my writing style and not "intelligent"/ "wise" as your high opinion suggests. No worries about the "outsider" thingy I was just pulling your leg... hehe
Thank you countrywoman. I appreciate being able to share opinions. You are right, on first glance she is very charming as long as you don't really pay attention to what she is saying.
I am glad to be a part of this community of writers and thinkers.
Marisue - you are absolutely correct. It was a crass moment from McCain when he let that 'that one' slip out. I was left wondering if it was intentional or accidental, but it hardly matters as each alternative is as bad as the other. What he betrayed was no 'mere' political incorrectness, but a deep-rooted contempt for a whole people. You did well to turn your spotlight on his shame.
mariesue, I couldn't watch the whole debate--it really made me sick. McCain reminds me of my father in the last year of his life. He had lung cancer that spread to his brain and throughout his body, and for the last year he was alive he had that same contemptuous, stuffed rage about him that McCain has now. It makes me wonder if the man is well, and I'm not saying that just because I'm voting for Obama--I really have serious doubts and his physical and mental health.
Palin has no such excuse. The fact that she didn't stop and immediately rebuke whoever shouted out "Kill him!" when she was trashing Obama as a potential terrorist chills me to the bone. What is happening to this country?
The irony is that in a few months we will have such severe problems just surviving that all this ugly politicking will be the farthest thing from our minds. I think we'll me more in the mode of, "How do I eat today?"
Thanks for having the courage to address this. It is all really wearing me down at this point. I feel like McCain & Palin shame us in the eyes of the world.
I'm afraid that this campaign is a done deal; the economy's problems have put the last nail in McCain's coffin. Before that, the two were close in the poles, now they are not. I'm not sure anymore about politics. I have concerns about both candidates in fact I have concerns about all politicians.
Madison
Countrywomen,
I certainly agree with Susan's comments (above) about your assessment of the candidates.
Speaking as an "outsider" I'd also like to point out one thing. John F. Kennedy, undoubtedly one of America's greatest presidents, came into office relatively young and inexperienced. In a time of crisis, he had the courage and judgment to make a call that averted a build up of nuclear weapons at the U.S. door step. In effect he averted what likely would have led to a nuclear confrontation.
George Bush came into office (twice!!) brimming with Commander-In-Chief confidence and a belly full of experience. He has since bogged the country in two wars, bungled through Katrina, and under his administration and policies he espouses, the U.S. and the world is in a financial tail spin.
Experience counts for naught without good judgment.
Marisue- Everything you said does make sense. I am glad I really met someone who practices charity (time, money, effort and emotions) on so many children, and such life changing experiences certainly help us to see from different perspectives. Since in my brief stay on this planet I haven't done anything close to the kind of charity that you have done or continuing to do, and I just pray to God that even I evolve as the kind hearted soul that marisue is.
Penmanzee- As I mentioned I am not a political pundit but just an observer. My observations are based on TV channels, talking to my fellow office colleagues and believe it or not on hub pages (although I do browse some other news sites online also).
As I said I have a very brief experience interviewing candidates (in IT field). So from that perspective 8/10 times when we select a candidate for a position we look at relevant experience. But that doesn't discount 2/10 times when we do look at outstanding candidates who have immense potential without experience. These people can pick up very quickly and leverage the strengths of others to solve the issues. From another perspective usually for an entrepreneur the first couple of times their judgement isn't entirely correct but if they persist then they may hit the jackpot. Very rarely except for a genius or incredibly lucky people the first judgement is bang on target. Hence the right kind of experiences in a majority of the cases leads to better judgement.
Having said that Barak falls into that exceptional candidate material and his selection of Biden shows he has the ability to leverage on certain areas to complement his shortcomings. And that shows very good judgement (To be aware of one's weakness is a strength in itself). As they say understanding the problem is half the solution.
P.S: All these were made not to hurt anyone's opinion. I regret if I unknowingly ruffled any feathers.
OK, I have to speak up here. Michelle Obama has down played the "that one" comment and stands as a great women, the wife of Barack Obama and hopefully the future First Lady of this growing and changing nation.
Therefore, even though i found the "that one" comment personally offensive, I really would like for the campaign to get back to talking about issues.
Apparently McCain's staff does not believe McCain can win by talking about the economy, so I wonder if we will hear anything substantial from McCain about the mess we are in.
As for the mess we are in, both major parties can accept and share blame, although much of the problem does stem from deregulation. Now, too much regulation is stifling, while not enough leads to chaos and, quite honestly, directly to the mess we are now in.
Obama seems to recognize that regulation alone will not solve the current mess or prevent a future occurrance of this mess, and he seems to recognize that it will take more than just a few expensive bandaides to cure the current mess.
McCain has offered some, in my humble opinion, vague ideas about this crisis, mainly saying that he knows what is needed to fix it, but even his website does not give much detail as to what that secret might be. I wonder if he really has an idea or not.
Obama seems to have an idea, and I, like many other voters, do not know if it will work or not, but as it becomes more widely circulated, and as experts in the field of economics weigh in, Obama's plan seems to carry more water than the vague statements of McCain.
I have also determined that people have decided, for various reasons, to vote for whomsoever they wish to, and that no amount of debate, either by candidates or by us, will change the mind of a dedicated voter for any candidate.
That said, I do feel bad that the campaign has come down to dirty tricks and lies about any of the candidates. i also feel very angry that certain comments by Sarah Palin have caused members of her audience to shout "Kill him!" when she mentions the tenuous links between Obama and Wm. Ayers.
I also find it disturbing that Palin has not told such people that killing the opponent is not the game plan. If she is the one inciting such hatred, it is her responsibility to quell such notionk,s and to do it quickly, not the next day, but right when it occurs.
I also find it fascinatibng that one of McCain's biggest supporters and contributors, the Annenberg family, were the ones who hired both Obama and Ayers to work on the charity committee the Annenbergs formed. To me, the link between Obama and Ayers is less direct than the link between the Annenbergs and McCain.
But in truth, there is no evil, secret link, and so the entire story just becomes one of desperation and falsehood. I call upon Sarah Palin to cease making this dangerous speech in which her supporters have now taken to call for Obama's death. It is dangerous for the nation,a and could get her in big legal trouble.
Furthermore I was surprised at Cindy McCain's statement that Obama voted against the bill to fund troops, when JOhn McCain voted against a similar bill. The only difference between the bills was that in the one Obama voted against, there was no timeline for winding down the war, bringing our troops home.
In the one McCain voted against, which was to my understanding the very same bill with the exception that a timeline for troop withdrawal had been added, he said it was a vote of conscience because (a) of the addition of the timetable and (b) because it would be vetoed by President Bush anyway.
Semantics.
Half truths and outright lies.
Shame on them all!
And, better said, shame on us for believing the lies!
Just cut the B.S., everybody and let's get down to the nitty-gritty. Who will make a better president? We really don't know. None of us do, no matter which candidates we back. It's not really a matter of experience, or, for that matter, even campaigh promises.
It seems to me it is a matter of conscience, of voting for our beliefs, and for the person who will do the best for this nation.
We have been charged by the founders of this nation to support the candidate we most believe will do the best for the nation. Look to the issues, not the crap and propaganda. Propaganda is for NAZIs and fanatics, for rebels without a clue.
As American citizens we are charged with making the most important decision in our times. We can't afford to go into this thing depending upon gut feelings, believing in falsehoods created or twisted to fit an agenda, thus ignoring facts.
It is our duty to rise above party politics, seek out the truth about each candidate and then make our decisions. To do otherwise is not what the creators of this nation demanded of us.
Marisuewrites, I applaud you efforts and courage, and to everyone who has commented, you obviously have passion for your point of view. Just make sure, I implore you all, to make sure you are voting for your candidate based upon the truth of his or her positions, ideas and plans, not those based upon the false characterization portrayed by the opponent.
The truth is out there, if you but open your eyes to see it.
Thank you for this Hub, Marisue!
When a person of influence makes a racist reference -- or allows one to go unchallenged -- it encourages racists, some of whom may go on to do a lot more than talk about their bigotry. That's the real danger.
If the person of influence apologizes very publicly for their gaffe, the situation is largely defused. Otherwise, they've only confirmed their active bigotry.
I'm not seeing anything approaching an apology.
Many thanks again, Marisue.
Great points Chef Jeff. Realize too that we are all probably giving vent to our frustarations with the system and the politicians. A little disconcerting those "Kill him" calls at the Palin rallies I must say. No one did anything?
I thought the 2nd debate was pablum in substance from both sides. McCain knows what he would really do and lies about it. Obama doesn't know what he would do but his heart is closer to people I care about. And that little bit of racism, I caught it and I bet every black person watching did too.
countrywoman, I really appreciate your comments and I think you undersell yourself. You do and will do the kind of charity that speaks to you. The fact that you want to aspire to that speaks volumes about who you are.
I was interested in your comments about hiring staff for an IT position. You said you look for relevant experience. I agree with you. I was a Director of a Mental Health Program and when I looked for staff, the experience piece did not matter to me as much. My feeling was I could always teach someone the mechanics of the job. I looked to hire a heart, someone who had the desire and heart to work with the chronically mentally ill.
Now what does all this have to do with Obama. He started his career as a community organizer and spent time bringing people together and taught them how to empower themselves. He helped them get jobs. He could have had any cushy Wall St or high priced law firm job coming from being the editor of the Law Review at Harvard. But he chose to help others.
He also was a civil rights lawyer and taught constitutional law in law school at the University of Chicago. He will have respect for the laws of our land and has the ability to bring people together. These are transferrable skills. The next President will have to bring both sides of the aisle together to get work done for our country and will have to work with all world leaders for our good and for the good of the world.The one thing that makes Obama stand out is that he is smart and that he will surround himself with smart people. He doesn't have to know everything. He will have people there to help him. John McCain won't know everything either should he be elected.
Countrywoman You are very gentle and humble in expressing your opinion. I appreciate your comments.
Susan,
Thanks for such a nice opinion about me. But seriously I don't deserve all this praise. I am just an ordinary person trying to understand and make sense of the political situation as everyone (who resides in US and also maybe the world) is affected by who the next President of US is going to be.
Yes I totally agree with the personality (heart as you said) aspect also does play critical while making selections. Knowledge/skills can be imparted but not the attitude. Obama certainly has the attitude. I liked his comment where he said "Instead of bringing(by words) each other down we should think about bringing the country up". Even his good wife (michelle) seemed to not pick up a fight(yesterday's jon stewart show) but calm the charged up environment.
Marisue- Thanks for publishing good hubs and allowing everyone the opportunity to expand their understanding on so many issues about various personalities. As elections are about both personalities and issues. Debates and discussions are an integral exercize in this process. At the end of the day the goal to see the country recover and prosper is there in everyone's heart. Let's us all hope/pray "God Bless America"
You are right Countrywoman
God bless America!
And the world! May we see peace in our lifetime.
I don't think McCain meant anything racist by "that one". Nor do I think the reason he assumed the questioner wouldn't know about Fannie & Freddy was because he was black (though I did think it insulting that he would assume a person who has the intelligence to ask important political questions wouldn't have read about them).
Don't get me wrong. I am NOT a McCain supporter. I absolutely hated how he said he could fix everything and how he knew everything. If he could do everything he claimed to do, he should have done them before. I also kept thinking "what perfect world does he live in" everytime he talked about how he wanted to lower taxes, yet wanted to give everyone a tax break for health insurance (with what money...?).
I thought Obama was more specific in his plans and I prefer a candidate that has a rough plan, than a candidate who lives in lollipopland.
Whether McCain intended to use the phrase "that one" to address the senator or the words slipped out by accident, and whether McCain intended the address as a racial slur or was not conscious of its racist implications, the fact remains that those two words and McCain's posture while delivering them were absolutely shocking, and yes, denigrating. You'd have to have lived in a cave all of your life, perhaps raised by wolves as well, to be unaware, intellectually or emotionally, of what these two words delivered this way signify.
I don't think McCain planned the utterance or the stance. He didn't have to. The words just fell out, and the pose was struck by reflex, because underneath his statesman's cloak lies the unspoken, knee-jerk, visceral knowledge of the pain and humiliation these words and actions will deliver.
So, who was pained and humiliated? Obama? His family? All people of color? Most certainly. But even more broadly, all of us as a nation were pained by the stunning, gut-felt realization that racism not only is alive and well in America, but resides explicitly in a candidate for the office of President of the United States.
I think it is a national tragedy that the *issue* of racism was not brought to the forefront and placed on campaign agenda by both major political parties in this presidential election. Racism is a festering wound that needs airing and antidote. And this festering is being fed within one of the deepest, dankest of human behaviors...denial.
I don't need to say that this is an outstanding Hub, do I?
Yes, Marisue, the Obamas, their campaign advisors, and their party compatriots in the Senate and House were all shocked. Make no mistake. However, all of them have agreed to keep racism out of the campaign, and the best way to do that is to deflect the attack by deeming it insignificant, or worse, saying that there was no attack. Theirs is a political tactic deriving from a national agreement (stated or unstated) that racist issues will play no part in this campaign. Not even the Democrats are going to open up this wound for healing.
Marisue,
I keep a saying hung on my wall at work, stand up for your principles, even if you have to stand alone. It speaks volumes to me.
In my opinion, out of all your outstanding hubs, this is by far the most 'outstandingest'
:)
You think McCain was racist for saying "that one". When I see Obama I think of him going to church for 20 years setting in the pew with Michelle while Rev Right teaches hatred and racism "godxxx America goddxx America.
wow what a fantastic hub marisue - you are to be commended for the stand you are taking in exposing/or should I say expounding on these racial issues that cause so much pain to so many people. P. Grundy has also written a very good hub on this same issue but from a slightly different viewpoint
I also really appreciated Susan Bonfiglio's comments and her poem from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. the sentiments expressed are as real today as they were when first written - maybe more so. Coming from another nation what also really scares me are the comments made by concerned readers and writers that it is quite possible that whoever wins the race to the White House may well be murdered for whatever reason (and it seems particularly the concerns are for Obama). It makes me wonder why anyone would willingly want to take this ultimate risk knowingly unless of couse their desire to help out their fellow countryman was totally overiding. "possible death by politics"
I still remember (I was a child) where I was and what I was doing when JFK was assassinated and the blow to the whole world his untimely death dealt. A brilliant (if inexperienced man) who will always be remembered for his "bay of pigs" intervention, his support of space flight, his charisma and his diplomacy - in many ways he reminds me of Obama. Caring Men of Substance.
Your hub is reasoned, concise, and states your feelings honestly. Palin has been found guilty of mis-using her office as governor in Alaska. I join you in my distaste for the senator from Arizona and for his runningmate who seems to easily blow off anyone who displays intelligence or disagrees with her.
The election is not won for Obana yet. We must get everyone we know who supports him out to vote. Yesterday the company that made the voting machines for Florida admitted the machines could be set to give a 51-49% win.
Would they dare do it again? Of Course~! They do whatever they can get away with. Mayb the people learned how easy we can lose our freedoms, but-- Keep up the good work.
This was a well-wriiten and well presented hub. The debate seemed to me to be little more than an hour and a half of talking points, with very little meat attached. Reading the commentary that your hub inspired was a better use of my time. Beyond all the passion and heartfelt opinions, I must admit that my favorite comment was from Patty Inglish "-- This is really like the WWE and WWF more all the time, but entertaining."
Longdrive4yu - you are the victim of the pundits' delusion, my friend -Reverand Wright was not preaching hatred for 20 years. If you wish to believe that statement created by certain agenda-driven pundits ask them to prove the statement. I beleive you will find they can't back up their words with action.
Reverand Wright has preached many sermons, mostly about God, and when I watched the entire sermon in which he unfortunately said GD America, he was quoting an Old Testament scripture that spoke about how a nation far from God will be condemned. That is a basic Christian belief. The word condemned is the basis for the word damned.
He was saying that America is not under some special protection clause in the Bibke, and that if we don't mend our ways we too will be damned, that is, condemned. Is he wrong? Well, many TV evangelists say the very same thing. Recently Pat Robertson claimed we will be bombed by nuclear weapons if we don't repent. If that's not damning America, I don't know what is.
In short, Reverand Wright was doing what he has often done - making us aware that we had best own up to our behavior or else. That is what the O. T. prophets did, and they gave their lives to proclaim it. It's right there in the Bible, for those who follow it. I'm sure the ancient Israelites were also screaming against their prophets for saying G.D. Israel!
I gott a side with Misha on this one. Vote McCain, the quicker we can get it over with the better. lol. Why prolong our agony with Obama besides with all the evident racism that still exist in this day and age, he is probabaly gonna get himself assisinated. :(
Longdrive, you've been taken for a ride. I understand being biased towards one position over another - we all are, whether we admit it or not. What I don't understand is taking a position and parroting it without educating oneself and doing some basic research. I'll not repeat what Chef Jeff said about the purpose of the prophetic voice. He covered that angle well. But I'll say this, sitting under the voice of a prophet (and in today's lexicon, Jeremiah Wright, John Hagee, Rod Parsley, and every preacher is a prophet) is not necessarily to be influenced or inflamed into radical thinking and behavior. It is to be challenged about the ills of the nation and take remedial action through repentance and rededication. What is wrong with that? More so, what's wrong with sitting in the pew to hear such a message? Let's all try and get that into our noggins so we can all move on. And you who keep bringing up the Obama/Wright connection why don't you also raise John Hagee and Rod Parsley whose endorsement McCain actively sought before he was against it? Their messages were equally inflammatory! It's fine to try and defend one's stand with specific examples, but what does it say about your stand if there are instances that contradict the position you take?
Sandra - you voice a legitimate concern many feel with respect to Obama's well-being. But then there always has to be a man like who, literally and (God forbid again) figuratively, would take the bullet for us. Those who show us an alternative - JFK, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, Steve Biko and (this may come as a surprise to those who believe only the right is right,) Jesus Christ.
Marisue,
I was just strolling by, hands in pockets, kicking cans to the kerb when peeked in your hub window and noticed this debate still raging. I still have two cents to spare.
Longdrive, you've been taken for a ride. I understand being biased towards one position over another - we all are, whether we admit it or not. What I don't understand is taking a position and parroting it without educating oneself and doing some basic research. I'll not repeat what Chef Jeff said about the purpose of the prophetic voice. He covered that angle well. But I'll say this, sitting under the voice of a prophet (and in today's lexicon, Jeremiah Wright, John Hagee, Rod Parsley, and every preacher is a prophet) is not necessarily to be influenced or inflamed into radical thinking and behavior. It is to be challenged about the ills of the nation and take remedial action through repentance and rededication. What is wrong with that? More so, what's wrong with sitting in the pew to hear such a message? Let's all try and get that into our noggins so we can all move on. And you who keep bringing up the Obama/Wright connection why don't you also raise John Hagee and Rod Parsley whose endorsement McCain actively sought before he was against it? Their messages were equally inflammatory! It's fine to try and defend one's stand with specific examples, but what does it say about your stand if there are instances that contradict the position you take?
Sandra - You raise a legitimate concern many harbor with respect to Obama's well-being especially in light of recent comments at Palin/McCain rallies. But then again, there are brave men and women who will literally and figuratively, take the bullet for those who take an alternate position e.g. JFK, Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, Steve Biko, Joan of Arc, and (this may come as a surprise to those who believe only the right can be right,) Jesus Christ. If we stifle dissent or cannot stand to be opposed we are steering towards dictatorship and cease to be the flagship of democracy.
true dat sista! Let's expect the worst and hope for the best. lol. No, I wouldn't vote McCain. Thought about it until what's her two face got on the ticket. I don't know if I had said this on any of your hubs yet, but I am forgoing the voting this year.
Seems like disaster will ensue either way. Though I would vote for Obama but he's black. Oooohhh before you readers get any ideas I am not racist, but there are plenty who still are, let's keep a good guy alive. :)
Not sure if this a good idea to post, but hey...
Chef Jeff & PenmanZee --
What you said!
I would also like to see a closer examination of the Alaskan Independence Party (not America lovers At All), and its connections with Sarah Palin and the "First Dude."
Sandra --
You're no racist, and it's time to express our fears. I share that one. But if we're so afraid that we vote good people out, or fail to vote at all, we'll only end up with bad choices that keep getting worse. Frankly there may be NO good answers -- it may be too late. But if we give up now, then it's too late for sure.
PenmanZee
You think I have been taken for a ride by suppoeting McCain well lets look at the facts Mr. Obama has
1.graduated Harvard
2. Community organizer
3. 2005 to present in the US Senate, three years in the senate wait a minute he has been campaining for president the last year so two years in the senate. Lets take a look at Mr Obama's record in the senate and see how he used his knowledge and power to bring people together.
Sponsored Bill Statistics Number of sponsored bills: 70 Number of sponsored bills passed: 2 Number of co-sponsored bills: 404 Number of co-sponsored bills passed: 8
PenmanZee you say I have been taken for a ride.
We live in the greatest country in the world and if Mr. Obama is elected president It will still be the greatest country in the world but in my opinion he is not the best choice.
Marisuewrites, in your response to PenManZee you are correct in pointing out that many Republicans are doing as you said. But so are many Democrats, and I have seen people for Obama and McCain spout out the most incredulous things about both sides.
I have done that myself, all in the belief that I am right and someone else is wrong. I have come to see that being right or wrong is not the issue. It is the excuse I give for wanting to be right. It is the game I play where I win and someone else loses.
I am moving to a place in my life where I am begining to embrace the entire election, the good, the bad and the ugly, and to go with it, not to resist it. The election will occur on November 4th and someone will win. No matter who I choose, someone will win. Period.
No matter the lies, I know what I believe and I believe it simply because I believe it. Lies are unimportant because they will not change what I believe. Lies will go away.
Suffice to say I also agree with your sentiment that I am voting for the candidate I choose, and someone else may be doing the same thing for the other candidate. I respect that entirely. We both have a right to our choices even if one or the other turn out to be for the candidate that loses.
Great hub with lots of opinions!
Cheers!
Chef Jeff
I am not a political person but was very offended and stunned at McCain's lack of courtesy. I think that was a horrible reference and most of America understood it for being a racist remark. I admire your courage in bringing it out. Don't worry about criticism, they are self-focused and maybe just not thinking how others react and feel.
Good article, Marisuewrites! I'm reading more and more of you and others on hub, this seems to be a good community.
Marisue
Great comments posted I hope we see this kind of passion from our canidates in the final debate
Dear Ms Marisuewrites: I'm arriving late to this discussion, and I hope it keeps going because the points you raise here are very significant to me. It has been apparent for many years how divided this country is between two very different factions. Many books have been written on this theme. Many have attempted to characterize the difference. And the differences of the two factions are revealed in your hub. By the way, your hub ought to be broadcasted around the world for everyone to take notice of how we in this country have begun a bifurcation of the species. My hit on this point is this: I truly believe we are species in the process of bifurcation. Some individuals are growing toward becoming enlightened humans, while some are declining into some other form. I have reasons for stating this, but your hub is not the proper place. I intend to make my own hub on the theme I've raised. And invite you all to join in when it is published.
Vitaeb - I'll wait for your hub with interest :)
marisue - I guess you have seen this! Found it on twitter.
Palin stepping down - is it for real?
http://touchcandy.com/searchtag/163/
cheers
I am so glad McCain and Palin did not win. Our poor world would be in more of a mess. The Republicans are desperate for attention, aren't they? Palin is a poor candidate choice, and most women are so insulted by her statements. The harder she tries to look smart, the more stupid she sounds.
I admire smart women and we have many in office, today. Not her. Not in anyone's wildest dreams could she have done the President's or VP's job.
Way to go, Marisuewrites, keep taking up for the right things. I read you.
I just had to read your hub again. Now there are a few people mad about Obama's election running around calling him a socialist, a marxist, and proclaiming that anyone less conservative than they listens exclusively to MTV. I was about to make an interesting comeback, but what is the point. Obama got compared to a turtle today in the forum, which I just thought was ridiculous!
I agree both parties have made mistakes, but what troubles me is that even here on Hubpages people are writing hubs declaring Obama to be a socialist. I pointed out to one person Obama has actually toned down his policies quite a bit. Obama probably did not want to conceded to the extent that he has, but he still has to deal with his ironcald opposition to some extent on issues such as healthcare. If Obama was completely partisan he could have pushed for more legislation that really would have go Republicans upset, but he is actually try to be bi-partisan and work together.
The liberal commentator Bill Maher has pointed out he thinks Obama is too moderate on some issues. Maher does not consider Obama a socialist, which might be some interesting information for the right, right wing Republicans throwing a tissy fit. I really do respect Obama and yes he may not be perfect, but some are just so bent out of shape about anyone liking him. I know it is not popular to say this, but could some people still be bothered by the fact he is an African-American man? Makes me wonder.








































Misha 3 years ago
Marisue, you should vote for McCain, this will be a right move in the current situation :P